Wednesday, October 21, 2026Houston edition
Houston
EXPLAINER · CLIMATEHouston

Hoping for a 'new normal' climate is pointless. We must learn to adapt

It’s increasingly common to hear climate-fuelled disasters described as the ‘new normal’. But our desire for normality and predictability is wishful thinking.

An apartment building surrounded by floodwater after Hurricane Isaac
Photo: Federal Emergency Management Agency, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Extract republished from The Conversation under its republishing terms. See Paper Trail for the original article.

Climate change is worsening. There’s now no chance of holding temperature rise to 1.5°C. The future will bring worsening floods, glacial melt, megafires and lethal heat.

But can we call this the “new normal”? The phrase has become common in discussions about the upheavals and damage stemming from human-caused climate change.

It’s human nature to want the future to be predictable: We are creatures of routine. If Earth’s climate really were going to settle into a “new normal” at 1.5°C of warming, we would find the idea comforting.

Read the full article on The Conversation

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license.

Paper Trail 1 document

Extract republished from The Conversation under CC BY-ND and its republishing guidelines, checked Oct 21, 2026. Only the opening paragraphs are quoted, exactly as published, because The Conversation requires its article-specific 1x1 page-view counter for full online republication and that counter could not be obtained from any fetchable source. No photographs copied. The full text was verified against a licensed republication of the article by phys.org.

How we did this

This page carries an extract, not the full article. The Conversation's republishing terms require an article-specific page-view counter for full online republication; the counter is supplied through the article's own republish embed, which could not be fetched. Lampline therefore quoted the opening paragraphs exactly and linked to the full article at The Conversation.

Report an error